I did learn a few things. Clifford starts out by making the case that CEO pay is too high, and how that damages American society.
The number of actual mechanisms by which pay raises are justified by these captive boards is astounding. There is a laundry list of little tricks to steal from shareholders and divert funds to management that Clifford describes.
Clifford has sat on a bunch of boards and audit committees, and so he has seen a number of these tricks employed first hand. He has also never dissented due to the peer pressure of wanting a unanimous vote, despite having reservations.
Sadly, there is probably no solution to this problem without regulation. The current terrible system is too entrenched, and companies with shares that are widely held are not likely to ever be able to influence boards as much as CEOs.
Enjoy!
You could read Tyler Cowen'S new book as a counterfactual:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.amazon.com/dp/1250110548
https://marginalrevolution.com/?s=Big+Business
I'm dubious that regulation wouldn't be worse than the problem.
ReplyDeleteI think the ideal situation is when you have a board in which the owners sit on the board and also have an owner/operator mindset. The president or CEO is not on the board and acts as an agent. There is friction at times but it's healthy. We have such a situation at a company of which I'm on the board.
Hi German,
ReplyDeleteI think it's important to separate CEO pay with the value that businesses provide society, which I do not dispute.
Hi Brian,
I agree that separating CEO and Chairman roles is important. I also think it's possible that regulations could make things worse. But having no regulations could also make things worse.
Oh, yes, didn't want to imply anything else. But he has a separate discussion about CEO pay and why it is justified very often.
ReplyDeleteI don't agree completely with him, but he has the talent to bring up the other side of any argument in a balanced way.