Warren Buffett has stressed many times that investor focus on quarterly earnings beats/misses is bad for both investors and companies. Rather than focus on the long-term, managers with such shareholders are implicitly encouraged to take all sorts of actions (e.g. cutting R&D expenditures) that increase short-term earnings at the expense of the company's future. At last year's Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting, Buffett pointed to a study (titled "Quadrophobia") that provides statistical evidence that suggests that the focus of management on short-term earnings is rather pervasive.
The paper is titled Quadrophobia due to management's apparent fear/avoidance of the number "4" as the third decimal in its earnings per share (EPS) reports. If the third decimal number is a four, the EPS number gets rounded down. The paper's authors scoured the universe of US public financial statements, however, and found that the number four (when dividing income by weighted average shares outstanding) is absent as the third decimal number by a statistically significant amount.
Why might this be the case? When management is close to rounding up its EPS number to the nearest penny (and having a four as the third decimal is as close as you can get), it will make the accounting adjustments it needs to in order to get there. Of course, not all companies engage in this sort of practice. But the authors found that the incidences of quadrophobia increase for companies that gain analyst coverage and where earnings come in close to analysts forecasts. Startlingly, the authors also found that persistent quadrophobes actually turn out to be more likely to be sued by the SEC!
What can the investor do with this knowledge? For one thing, it should reinforce the notion that one should not buy/sell a company if it beats/misses short-term earnings by a few pennies here and there. One might be tempted to check the third decimal of the companies in one's portfolio, but unfortunately even if the number four is absent from these calculations, the results for any one company would not be significant enough to draw any conclusions. As a whole, using EPS as a measure of a company's health has some definite drawbacks, and so investors would be wise to focus on other measures.
4 comments:
Saj,
GDC is at $4.41 today(10:39). Do you think it's a good buy?
I am tempted. But I know market believes the buyout will not happen.
Thanks. I do have 800 shares.
Saj,
Was wondering if you had any interest in looking into DST systems, provider of record keeping services for mutual fund companies. A look at its numbers over the past 10 years would lead you to believe that it is a pretty solid but not great business. Also looks like they wasted a bunch of money on buybacks and they have quite a bit of leverage. On the plus side the market cap is 2.2B and they are averaging 270M in net income the past 3 years.
-Matt Jones
Hi Anon,
I couldn't really tell you, as it depends on your individual situation.
Hi Matt,
I'll take a look and post here if I have any thoughts on it.
Hi Matt,
It does look cheap superficially, but I can't honestly say I have a good grasp of their business model. Software systems are prone to disruptive technologies, and I can't say I'm confident I can predict their earnings power as a result.
Post a Comment